between compassion and racism. And
so it’s very easy to confuse the two.
According to
Webster’s, "compassion" is "a sympathetic
consciousness of another’s distress together with a desire to
alleviate it." And "racism" is a belief that race is the primary
determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial
differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular
race."
Now it’s clear from
the foregoing that for one to feel compassion, she must
know the object of that compassion personally. She must be aware of
the specific nature of that person’s difficulty. And she must be
willing to directly do whatever is necessary to help that person
alleviate the distress involved.
On the other
hand, for one to be a racist all she need do is believe
that all the members of a specific race are limited or
defective in some manner, and that because she’s not of that race,
she’s superior.
And so I submit
that when one’s compassion is directed at individuals she
knows personally, when it’s the result of first-hand
knowledge of the cause of that person’s distress, and when it’s
followed by action specifically directed to alleviate that distress,
it’s probably real compassion that she’s feeling.
But
conversely, when one’s compassion is directed at all
the members of another race, when there’s no first-hand knowledge of
any individual member’s distress, and when that compassion is
followed by action intended to alleviate the imagined distress of an
entire race, then it’s probably not real compassion that she’s
feeling. Instead, it’s probably the phony kind of compassion that a
lot of people use to mask what is really their own racism.
Think about it.
