|
ave you ever
given any thought to what
happens as far as all the players are concerned when a
university adopts so-called affirmative action as part of its
admissions policy? Not just in terms of the visible players. But in
terms of all the players?
First, affirmative action
is a zero-sum game. For every one admitted although he or she lacked
the necessary qualifications, there is someone else who was denied
admission, not because he or she wasn’t qualified, but rather
because he or she has the "wrong" skin color. Or the "wrong" ethnic
origin.
And I’m not talking about
mere abstractions, now. I’m talking about real, live,
flesh-and-blood humans. With aspirations, with goals, with feelings.
Youngsters who worked very hard to achieve their grades and SAT
scores.
And second, the justification
for affirmative action most frequently voiced is that it’s
the only fair way to make up for 200
years of slavery. (How that relates to Hispanics I still haven't figured
out.)
Now let me ask you something.
How do you think you would feel if the cops came to your door,
arrested you, and put you in the slammer for a year because your
great, great, great, grandfather stole a horse and was never
punished for it? And when you protest that your grandfather
was the culprit, not you
, you’re told that we’ve gotta make up for 200 years
of lawlessness.
The more I think about it,
the more convinced I become that a reworking of something Jesus said
would aptly describe the whole area of affirmative action: Greater
love hath no man than to lay down for his friends someone
else’s life.
You know, if anyone feels
strongly about having one of the "disadvantaged" admitted to his
school, then why doesn’t he give that person his place
instead of someone else’s? Now that would be an act of love. But
giving that young person someone else’s place is not an act
of love. It’s an act of hypocrisy.
Think about
it.
|