|
 was dismayed a while back when the opponents
of Proposition 209 resorted to violence to protest its being put
into effect as the law of the state. And I immediately thought of a
story that I had read many years ago.
It seems
that an American on tour in China was distracted from his
sight-seeing itinerary by loud, angry shouts which seemed to be
coming from a cluster of people on a side street in what was then
called downtown Peking.
Close
investigation revealed two coolies, face-to-face,
toe-to-toe, angrily shouting insults at each other, surrounded by
curious onlookers.
After witnessing
the altercation for a moment or two, the American turned to
one of the older spectators and asked, "Why doesn’t one of them just
haul off and belt the other one in the mouth?" The old man recoiled
in horror at what had just been asked him. "Oh no," he replied,
"each of the two men knows that the first one to resort to violence
will be making it very plain to the onlookers that he was the
first one to have run out of ideas."
Similarly, by
turning violent after their defeat at the polls, the
opponents of Prop 209 made it abundantly clear that they were
the first ones to have run out of ideas.
But they also
demonstrated two other things by their actions: (1) that
they believe in the democratic process but only when it suits
their purpose and (2) that they are poor losers, indeed.
You know, we’re
continually being told that the future of the country lies
in the hands of our young people. Well, if the way the opponents of
Prop 209 behaved in the aftermath of the election is any indication
of what our young people are like — and I do believe that most of
them are of college age — then I shudder to think what lies
ahead for the rest of us.
Think about it.

 |