is it OK to form an
organization called the National Association of Black Whatever or
Women’s Whatever or Hispanic Whatever or Gay or Lesbian Whatever.
But it’s not OK to form one called the National Association of White
Whatever or Men’s Whatever or Anglo–Saxon Protestant Whatever or
Heterosexual Whatever? Why?
And why is it OK for black youngsters
or Hispanic youngsters or whatever youngsters to fall short of the
entrance requirements at virtually every college and university in
the U.S. and still be admitted when the same is not true for white
(or for some strange, unfathomable reason Oriental) kids?
Why?
The only justification
ever offered in support of the
patent unfairness of this whole thing is that the members
of the first group are trying to recover from decades of
mistreatment. (Even the teenagers?)
The members of the
second group have no such problem.
So in the interest of
fairness, allowances have to be made.
It’s an argument that’s
a perfect example of a fallacy
of logic known as the fallacy of special pleading.
Which involves the
application of a double standard: one for the members of a
group claiming to be underprivileged, or disadvantaged, and,
therefore, deserving of special consideration, and another, a much
stricter one, for everyone else.
But which other racial, ethnic, or
religious group members in this country couldn't justifiably make
the same claim? The Orientals? The Irish? The Germans? The Amish?
The Mormons? The Jews? Which?
Perhaps
the best treatment of this
deplorable hypocrisy that you'll ever run across is the chilling
last and final Commandment put up on the wall by one of the pigs in
George Orwell’s book titled Animal Farm: It said:
ALL ANIMALS ARE EQUAL
BUT SOME ANIMALS
ARE
MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS
Think about it.