George Orwell painted a picture of
the US in which democracy had been replaced by dictatorship. Not the
bully boy type that we usually associate with the name Adolph
Hitler. But with a much more insidious type: Rule by guile, rather
than by fist; rule by the perversion of language, rather than by the
jack boot.
To accomplish this, Big Brother, America’s
ruler, developed what Orwell called Newspeak, such as "Slavery is
Freedom!" and "War is Peace." Big Brother did it because, as Orwell
explains in the book: "If thought corrupts language, language can
also corrupt thought. . . . The purpose of Newspeak is to make all
other modes of thought impossible."
Well, was the book the product of what might
be termed today the paranoia of someone who saw a Communist under
every bed and a Fascist in every private club? Or was it a chilling
portent of things to come?
I’m going to let you decide.
To lay the groundwork for your decision, I’m
going to give you the entire text of Proposition 209, word for word,
as submitted to the voters in California a few years
back:
"The state shall not discriminate against,
or grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the
basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the
operation of public employment, public education, or public
contracting."
In short, equality for all. No edges for
anyone for any reason.
Yet given all that, I was handed a pamphlet
while out running errands a few days before Election Day. The
headline on the first page, in big type, was the
following:
"Vote No on Proposition 209 and Say Yes to
Equal Opportunity."
And the name of the organization that
produced that bit of Newspeak whose purpose was to make all other
modes of thought impossible? "Californians for Justice."
Think about it.
