|
of the more insidious
devices used by some folks to control people is the
nonsense known as tradition or heritage or cultural
imperative.
They’re insidious because they require the
individual to submerge his or her uniqueness to the imaginary
requirements of an imaginary entity.
Which means the
voluntary giving up of one’s freedom to satisfy the needs
of something that doesn’t even exist except in people’s
heads.
Let me support what I just said.
According to Webster’s, a tradition
is something handed down from the past, such as a culture or an
attitude.
A heritage is
something that’s passed on to succeeding generations. And I
might add that that something is always nonmaterial or abstract.
Never concrete.
And a culture
comprises the customary beliefs, social forms, and material
traits of a racial, religious, or social group. And if the culture
involved is held to be imperative, that makes it obligatory,
binding, or compulsory. In other words, you’ve got to adhere to its
requirements no matter what.
You know, it wasn’t long ago when it was
traditional to burn witches, when anti-Semitism was part of the
heritage of millions, and when lynching was a cultural imperative.
Now the bad guys who got the good guys to do
all those horrible things probably never used the terms tradition,
heritage, or cultural imperative. What they probably talked about
instead was the need to protect the public from black magic, to
purify the race, and to keep the so-called uppity blacks in their
place, all as their forebears had done for centuries.
As Edmund Burke once put it: "The people
never give up their liberties but under some delusion." So all I’ve
got to say is if the shoe fits, etc. etc. etc.
Think about it.

|