|
 continually astonished
by the number of people I’ve experienced who let other
people do their thinking for them.
I say that because
of the negative, disapproving, pejorative comments I’ve heard them
make at the mere mention of a name, someone they don’t know, have
never conversed with, have never rubbed shoulders with. Such being
the case, the nature of those comments had to be determined by
others.
Let me give you a few names:
Rush Limbaugh, John F. Kennedy, Newt Gingrich, Ronald
Reagan, Jesse Jackson, Mark Fuhrman, Bill Clinton.
Now what makes people
react the way they do to the mere mention of any one of these
folks? I don’t know. But I have a theory that you might wish to
consider.
One of the more powerful human
needs
is the need
for peer approval. Keeping that in mind, how do you think you’d be viewed by
your peers were you living in Berkeley and you gave your
neighbors the impression that you were a fan of Ronald Reagan or Newt
Gingrich?
Or, at the other end
of the political spectrum, by your peers in Hillsborough were you to
give them reason to believe that you are a Jesse Jackson or Bill
Clinton booster?
Now peer approval is all very
nice,
given that it can foster social harmony.
But it can also be
dreadfully expensive.
You see, it doesn’t confine
itself to any single area of your mind, such as the mental
pigeonhole you use for all matters political. But like a cancer, it
continues to expand until it takes over all of your mind. At which
point, you don’t own you. Your peers own you.
So tell me, is it worth it?
In Biblical terms, is it worth losing your freedom and
integrity just to gain the approval of others?
Think about it.
 |